Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 05:32

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Why did VP Vance decide to humiliate the President of Ukraine on national TV?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Exclusive | EchoStar Prepares Potential Bankruptcy Filing Amid FCC Review - WSJ
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are some current trends in sci-fi and fantasy literature?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Which is the safest protein powder in India for use?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why does the UK Labour MP Jess Philips seem to be such a divisive figure?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
These glowing axolotls may hold the secret to human limb regeneration - MSN
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
HBO’s New Movie Fiercely Splits Critics & Audiences On Rotten Tomatoes - Screen Rant
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.